Sudan

Investment & Operational Criteria

Key Indicators

Risk Premia

6.875

%

Outlook

Neutral

Rating

DD|5U|±

Ranking

115

Reserves (1P)

Total

mm boe

Oil

0

%

Summary

The advent of the O&G sector has precipitated some measure of stability, but a weak governmental structure continues to create risks.

Updated

January 25, 2024

Country Basics

Region

Africa - East

Reserves (1P)

Oil

mm bbl

Gas

bcf

Location

SudanSudan

North-eastern Africa, bordering the Red Sea, between Egypt and Eritrea

Outline

Tax Regime
Type

PSC/PSA

Tax Regime
Notes

Upstream licences in Sudan are awarded under production-sharing contract terms (PSCs), which are governed by the 1972 Petroleum Resources Act (as amended in 1975). The National Oil Company (NOC), Sudapet, typically takes a 5-20% stake in any commercial development comprising a carried interest through the exploration and development phase. warding of licences is negotiated on an ad hoc basis. The main production-sharing terms are cost recovery and profit sharing, which are negotiated and subject to certain limits. Royalty is levied at flat rates and is negotiated. Corporate income tax is paid by Sudapet.

Investment & 
Operational
Climate

After many months of popular protests, the 30-year regime of Omar Bashir came to an end in April 2019. A civilian-led transitional government (CLTG) took power in September 2019, with a mandate to establish political institutions and hold elections within 39 months. Severe economic problems, namely rising bread and fuel prices, drove the 2018-19 protests. These problems persist, partially due to infrastructure and transport deficiencies but also due to decades of mismanagement, corruption, and economic practices of the former regime. Although the lifting of the economic sanctions regime in late 2017 allowed international banks to offer services that were restricted for years due to the embargo, financial institutions have maintained a guarded approach in engaging with Sudan. Sudan’s designation as a state sponsor of terrorism (SST) is one reason financial institutions do not provide services even though the United States no longer prohibits private companies from doing business in Sudan. This has hampered the ability to conduct international money transfers and payments through banking institutions. Consequently, banking, financial, and transaction services are often expensive and time consuming for the public and private sectors due to a need to find alternative means to make payments.

Source: ESRI, Heritage Index, HMG Foreign & Commonwealth Office, US Department of State, International Trade Administration, International Law Review, Ernst & Young, Wood Makenzie & OGA data.

© 2024 Oil & Gas Advisors Limited
Website by Rugby Web Design